New York Times NYRegion A look back on NYTimes.com's 5th anniversary
The New York Times
home
Classifieds
  Automobiles
Job Market
Real Estate
All Classifieds
News
  Quick News
NYT Front Page
Arts
Business
Health
International
National
New York Region
Obituaries
Politics
Science
Sports
Technology
Weather
Corrections
Special: Taxes
Opinion
  Editorials / Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions
Features
  Automobiles
Books
Cartoons
Crossword/Games
Job Market
Living
Magazine
Movies
Photos
Real Estate
Travel
Week in Review
Special: Oscars
Click Here for NYTimes.com Weekly Newsletters
Destinations
  Boston.com
GolfDigest.com
Learning Network
New York Today
NYT Store
Shopping
Services
  Archives
Screensavers
Help Center
Media Kit
NYT Mobile
Our Advertisers
Newspaper
  Home Delivery
Customer Service
Your Profile
Review Profile
E-Mail Options
Log Out
Text Version
search Welcome, stevie2  
Sign Up for Newsletters  |  Log Out
  
Go to Advanced Search
E-Mail This Article Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles Single-Page View

March 26, 2001

Harmful Effects of Acid Rain Are Far-Flung, a Study Finds

By KIRK JOHNSON

Readers' Opinions

Join a Discussion on The Environment

Acid rain in the Northeast is not just about lakes without fish, but also about forests losing their trees and soils that hoard acid before leaching it back out to contaminate local waters all over again, according to a scientific study of upstate New York and New England.

In short, the problem is more densely wound into the ecosystems it affects than scientists had previously believed, the report says and thus harder to fight than it had appeared.

"It's a lot more complicated," said Charles T. Driscoll, a professor of environmental engineering at Syracuse University and the lead author of the study, which is to be published today in the journal BioScience.

The study, which examined data going back to the early 1960's, bolsters the conclusion already reached by many scientists that lakes and ponds in New York State and New England are not recovering from acid rain pollution. Even after 30 years of federally mandated air-emissions reductions in industry and at coal-burning power plants that are considered primary acid-rain sources, more than 40 percent of the lakes in the Adirondack Mountains at least periodically have acid levels that harm aquatic life, the study says.

Although new deposits of airborne acid compounds like sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides have declined, the study says that decades of acid buildup in forest soils is still being washed into waterways by erosion and spring runoff. In a paradoxical twist on environmental protection, the study found that some improvements in air quality have also proved to be a rather mixed blessing on the acid-rain front. Airborne pollutants that neutralize acid, like cement dust, partly counteract acid rain. Those pollutants are not falling into the soils in the quantities that they once did.

The report, based in part on data from the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest in New Hampshire, comes at a time when the connections between air pollution and the nation's electricity-generating needs have become more complicated. Earlier this month, President Bush said he would oppose mandatory emissions reductions of carbon dioxide, an industrial gas most commonly linked to a different environmental problem, global warming. Mr. Bush said a mandatory reduction could hurt what he called an already stressed energy market.

Congress, meanwhile, is considering legislation that would sharply reduce the amount of acid-rain gases that power plants and other industries could discharge. States in the Northeast, including New York, have sued the owners of power plants in the Midwest, where much of the Northeast's acid-rain pollution originates. They have also asked the federal Environmental Protection Agency to issue new regulations on acid rain, with or without action by Congress.

Some environmental experts say that a confluence of forces is reviving a debate about acid rain that had been mostly quiet in recent years. There is greater public awareness of energy needs, they say, and growing evidence that past legislation to address acidic pollution in the nation's waters has not done the job.

"From our point of view, whether it's science, economic policy or politics, it's becoming more and more clear and this report makes it more urgent that we act this year to reduce the pollutants that cause acid rain," said Timothy J. Burke, executive director of the Adirondack Council, a conservation group in upstate New York.

Other experts say the debate is not so clear cut. Dan Riedinger, a spokesman for the Edison Electric Institute, an industry trade group that backed Mr. Bush's decision on carbon dioxide emissions, said his group would support a long-term effort to reduce the gases that cause acid rain and acid soil. But the current acid rain bills now before Congress go too far, too fast, he said.

"It's far from clear that such a drastic measure is needed to achieve a valid public policy goal," Mr. Riedinger said.

Dr. Driscoll of Syracuse said that many conclusions in the Hubbard Brook study had been reached by others. The federal Government Accounting Office, for example, concluded last year that reductions in air emissions had not cleaned up the lakes of the Northeast. But, he said, his group found evidence that acid rain was acting like a web in the northern forests, linking and compounding other problems that had seemed unrelated.

The two-year study concluded that the red spruce and the sugar maple have been hurt in different ways by acidified soils. Many tree deaths that had been attributed to things like insect infestation or drought, the study said, had in fact been hastened by acidic soil that made the trees more vulnerable.

Dr. Driscoll said that the group's research also suggested that the interplay between acid rain and global warming, though caused by different types of industrial gas pollutants, is also more complicated than had previously been believed. In particular, he said, many widely reported tree deaths in parts of the Adirondacks and New England in recent years were attributed mainly to shifts in the regional climate. The research suggests, however, that the trees were weakened first by acidified soils that made them less able to withstand climate changes.


E-Mail This Article Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles Single-Page View


  •  
  • New Commemorative plaque honors NASCAR legend

  •  
  • Digital Camera memory dilemma solved!

  •  
  • Time zone to time zone never set your watch again

  •  
  • The best household cleaner is...H20?

  •  
  • Digital video camera records movies and still pictures for your computer and the Web

  •  
  • Private DVD theater puts a floating 6-foot screen right before your eyes

  •  
  • How to make your car invisible to radar and laser

  •  
  • First air treatment that humidifies and cleans the air


    Advertisement

    Plan Your Taxes With NYTimes.com
    Get the latest on Mutual Funds
    Trade stocks for $7 @ Scottrade.com, 125+ offices!
    Learn more about college sports

    Click Here to Receive 50% Off Home Delivery of The New York Times Newspaper.


    A look back on NYTimes.com's 5th anniversary
    Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company | Privacy Information